The design for the new Exceat Bridge will have no cycling provision. There are no plans to update the footpath to the forest or have any lights at all. This includes no controlled pedestrian crossings. With the traffic constantly flowing it could be even harder to use this stretch of road.
This is a good opportunity to make the area safer for all users.
I’m quite disappointed to see that little attention has been paid to the comments / concerns we highlighted. There is also confirmation that the project doesn’t take into account the causeway, it is for the bridge only. As a small positive the road around the bridge will be slowed to 30mph from 60mph which will hopefully improve safety.
It does amuse me that the council feels that a controlled crossing will ‘spoil the natural landscape’… personally I can’t see the logic.
The planning application should be submitted in April next year. At this point we will have another opportunity to comment.
I am contacting you to advise that East Sussex Highways are soon due to start this year’s programme of surface dressing which could impact cyclists locally.
Surface dressing is a surface treatment method which improves safety by increasing skid resistance and can extend the life of the carriageway by up to 10 years as it helps protect roads from frost and water damage.
The surface dressing process is undertaken through spraying bitumen binder on to a dry road surface, then spreading stone chippings and rolling the surface to help embed the chippings. Once the surface dressing is finished, the road is reopened to traffic as this helps bed the remaining chippings in. Excess chippings are swept around 24 hours, three days & seven days after the work is completed. However, there may be loose chippings for up to 2 weeks after the surface has been laid. As I am sure you are aware, these loose chippings can be potentially hazardous for cyclists, we would therefore recommend that cyclists look at alternative routes to avoid recently surface dressed sites. We have listed each site and a potential date for works below:
Beechwood Lane, Cooksbridge – 16th June 2021
Coleman’s Hatch Road, Forest Row – 16th June 2021
Edenbridge Road, Hartfield – 17th June 2021
Mayfield Lane, Wadhurst – 18th June 2021
St Mary’s Lane, Sidley – 18th June 2021
Compton Drive, Eastbourne – 18th June 2021
The Dicker, Laughton – 21st June 2021
Burwash Road, Broad Oak – 22nd June 2021
Cooper’s Corner, Hurst Green – 22nd June 2021
Hawkhurst Road, Flimwell – 23rd June 2021
Udimore Road, Udimore/Brede – 24th June 2021
Whiteway, Alfriston – 25th June 2021
Wartling Road, Pevensey – 25th June 2021
Due to the nature of surface dressing works, they are highly weather dependant. Works cannot be done if it is raining, too hot or too cold, therefore the above dates are subject to change depending on weather. Updates can be found on our website:
https://cycleseahaven.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/election-2.jpeg7891400Simon McFarlanehttps://cycleseahaven.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/CycleSeahaven2-300x298.pngSimon McFarlane2021-05-03 20:43:512021-05-03 20:48:36English elections: Local cycling for everyone
“We have highlighted on this map the improvements we think are needed to the National Cycle Network. While we won’t be able to implement all the changes immediately, having plans in place will help us bid for funding when it becomes available.
We invite you to leave your comments against any of the features on the map, to let us know what you think of the suggestions. This will be really useful when we come to detailed planning for each section. We will review all the comments as we develop our plans, although we won’t be able to reply to them all.”
If you would like to leave comments against any of the proposals you will need to request a user ID from email@example.com
https://cycleseahaven.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/sustrans-map.jpg7731209Simon McFarlanehttps://cycleseahaven.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/CycleSeahaven2-300x298.pngSimon McFarlane2021-04-29 15:39:492021-04-29 15:39:49Sustrans Network Development Plans consultation tool
In 2013, a partnership scheme between Brighton and Hove City Council (BHCC), East Sussex County Council (ESCC), the South Downs National Park Authority (SDNPA), with funding support from the Department for Transport, installed an unbound path along a permissive bridleway adjacent to Falmer Road between Woodingdean and Falmer. On the doorstep of the National Park, the 2.5km path has been a popular route for walkers, cyclists and commuters since it was installed as well as providing a key traffic-free link from Woodingdean to the University of Sussex campus and the American Express Community Stadium. Unfortunately, over time the path has eroded, become uneven and overgrown, making it unusable for some people.
In March 2021, a further partnership scheme between the three authorities will spend around £300,000 to enhance the existing route by installing a sealed, smooth surface and make it accessible for everyone using it. Funding is being provided by BHCC, SDNPA and ESCC (via the Department for Transport’s Emergency Active Travel Fund – tranche 2)
Key information about the improvement works are listed below:
Overgrown vegetation will be removed and the original footprint of the path will be reinstated providing a sealed surface with a minimum width of 2.5m along the entire 2.5km route. An additional width of unsealed path adjacent to the sealed surface would be available for equestrian use.
The works are due to start on 15th March 2021 and are planned to take up to 14 weeks to complete, weather permitting.
The path will have to be temporarily closed while the work is carried out for the safety of the public and the team working on site.
Once the works are complete, the route will be recorded on the Definitive Map (the legal record of all recorded public paths) as a public right of way and will therefore be protected and maintained for future generations by the respective local highway authorities. This will be achieved by dedicating the route as a public bridleway via agreement with the landowner.
As part of the works we will also review and improve signage and will review the existing barriers at the northern end of the path to ensure they meet current accessibility and equestrian design guidance.
Signs will be installed at the access points to the path to remind users that the path is closed.
Information regarding the temporary closure will be circulated in the local press and on social media in advance of the works but we would welcome your support to share this information via your networks.
https://cycleseahaven.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/south-downs.jpg7311106Simon McFarlanehttps://cycleseahaven.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/CycleSeahaven2-300x298.pngSimon McFarlane2021-03-04 20:10:402021-03-04 20:21:47Surface upgrade on Falmer Road Multi-user Path between Woodingdean and Falmer
The public consultation for the Local Cycling & Walking Infrastructure Plan (LCWIP) is open from 30th October 2020 for a six-week period. This is East Sussex County Council’s (ESCC) proposed plan for the next 10 years.
Alongside the consultation, ESCC are also proposing to commission a feasibility study to identify the potential for providing fully segregated cycle routes and low traffic neighbourhoods. The scope of this study is currently being developed and they will share more information when it is available.
I have seen the original document and commented earlier this year. What may not be clear is that there is no allocated funding for any of the changes highlighted. If we want it to happen then it will need to be campaigned for.
If you’ve not heard yet The Highway Code is under review. The proposal is to amend The Highway Code to introduce a hierarchy of road users, clarify pedestrian and cyclist priority, establish safer overtaking.
Just imagine that… it would change our roads for cyclists and pedestrians. In my opinion this is way overdue. Over the past 30 years we have gone from 20 million to approaching 40 million cars. Our towns and cities haven’t got any bigger… just fuller. The whole road system is creaking.
Many people believe that roads are paid for by “Road Tax” but that isn’t true. Drivers pay Vehicle Excise Duty based on how polluting your car is. Roads are funded from general taxation. That means you have to pay for them whether you own a car or not. As such readdressing the balance in support of cyclists and pedestrians seems only fair.
Cycling UK have also highlighted rule 66 about riding 2 abreast:
However, one newly proposed rule – the new wording for Rule 66 – didn’t sit quite so easily with some people, particularly in respect of whether, and in what circumstances, cyclists can or should ride two abreast.
The current rule reads: “You should…never ride more than two abreast, and ride in single file on narrow or busy roads and when riding round bends”.
There are a number of issues with this wording – most notably that corners of country lanes and narrow roads are some of the most dangerous places for a driver to overtake a cyclist – but moving to single file at exactly this point may encourage them to do just that.
We were therefore initially happy with the proposed new wording, that:
“[cyclists’ should] ride in single file when drivers wish to overtake and it is safe to let them do so. When riding in larger groups on narrow lanes, it is sometimes safer to ride two abreast”.
Consultation end on 11:59pm on 27 October 2020… so don’t delay.
https://cycleseahaven.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/madiera-drive-brighton.jpg8591145Simon McFarlanehttps://cycleseahaven.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/CycleSeahaven2-300x298.pngSimon McFarlane2020-10-18 22:26:202020-10-19 08:32:13Why the Highway Code should protect riding two abreast
People often comment on the Dutch and their obsession with the bicycle. Why do they cycle? The fact is they haven’t always.
“Before World War II, journeys in the Netherlands were predominantly made by bike, but in the 1950s and 1960s, as car ownership rocketed, this changed. As in many countries in Europe, roads became increasingly congested and cyclists were squeezed to the kerb.
The jump in car numbers caused a huge rise in the number of deaths on the roads. In 1971 more than 3,000 people were killed by motor vehicles, 450 of them children.
In response a social movement demanding safer cycling conditions for children was formed. Called Stop de Kindermoord (Stop the Child Murder), it took its name from the headline of an article written by journalist Vic Langenhoff whose own child had been killed in a road accident.”
There was lots of resistance to change – but look at it now! Infrastructure was the key. Would you be happy to let your child, grandchild, niece or nephew cycle alone? If the answer is yes – then it’s a good place to cycle.
Currently in the UK 60% of motor vehicle journeys are 1-2 miles. If we could replace many of those journeys with cycling just think how much easier it would be for commercial vehicles, emergency vehicles and those who need their car to get around.
My son is 12… we were recently looking at photos of me at the same age. One really obvious thing we noticed was how empty the streets were. Photos of me and friends on our bikes and skateboards. Playing Kerby. There were about 20 million cars – now there are 38.3 million. It’s happened slowly… slowly enough that no one noticed. Like my hairline – but in reverse.
Unfortunately during my time campaigning I have encountered a lack of conviction from East Sussex County Council who seem intent on keeping the status-quo. It is becoming increasingly obvious that climate change and biodiversity loss are changing the status-quo for us. A point made shockingly clear when watching David Attenborough: A Life on Our Planet yesterday.
What can we do?
It’s important to let your local politicians know what you think. They, after all, are there to represent our views.
Would you support a local car-free day in the high street?
Would you support restrictions on parking to make space for cycling?
How about 20mph in residential streets?
Closing of roads around schools at the start and end of the school day?
All these initiatives are currently being supported by some local councillors / candidates.
Secondly we can lead by example. As a family we only use the car when we have to. If we can walk or cycle we do. That’s not just out of sheer bloody mindedness… I honestly prefer it. Driving is just so stressful and cycling turns a chore into fun with a bit of exercise thrown in. Trip to the post office via the seafront, bit of fresh air, leave the bike outside (no hassle with parking). Makes perfect sense.
Have a watch of the video below and see what you think. Would you be happier to cycle if it was like that? I know I certainly would.
Video courtesy of BicycleDutch on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC67YlPrRvsO117gFDM7UePg
https://cycleseahaven.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/ypenburg-the-hague-03.jpg5631000Simon McFarlanehttps://cycleseahaven.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/CycleSeahaven2-300x298.pngSimon McFarlane2020-10-05 13:16:292020-10-05 13:16:29Why the Dutch cycle...
In a meeting on Monday 17th August it was decided to not proceed with the plans that East Sussex County Council submitted to the Depart of Transport for funding in both Seaford and Newhaven.
Unfortunately after we provided three sets of proposed improvements none were included in any of the emergency measures. Therefore there will be no emergency measures to support walking and cycling in the Lewes District Council area from the first Tranche of funding.
As you can imagine this is very disappointing to everyone involved and frankly quite surprising. The Secretary of State for Transport Grant Schapps and the Department for Transport were both asking for councils to do whatever they can to make it safer to walk and cycle.
I’m still hoping that we will get the additional cycle parking – although at this point I can’t get any information!
Cycle Seahaven member Councillor Carolyn Lambert commented:
“Some parts of Lewes, including Seaford, will receive no benefit from this funding.If the money is not spent, then the government will claw it back which would be a huge missed opportunity.Cycle Seahaven, one of the biggest cycling groups in the county, has put forward some perfectly achievable proposals, including some for simple signage, which seem to have been discounted.I hope that the County Council will re-consider its approach and listen to local residents”.
https://cycleseahaven.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/No_cycling__sign_Crawfordsburn_Glen_-_geograph.org_.uk_-_1690302.jpg518640Simon McFarlanehttps://cycleseahaven.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/CycleSeahaven2-300x298.pngSimon McFarlane2020-08-21 09:47:542020-08-21 09:51:23East Sussex Country Council turns down Covid-19 schemes in Seaford and Newhaven