Cycling UK are asking you to think about cycling at the upcoming elections…. find out more here:
Cycling UK are asking you to think about cycling at the upcoming elections…. find out more here:
Sustrans have developed an online tool that enables people to comment on our Network Development Plans across the South of England which you can browse:
How it works:
“We have highlighted on this map the improvements we think are needed to the National Cycle Network. While we won’t be able to implement all the changes immediately, having plans in place will help us bid for funding when it becomes available.
We invite you to leave your comments against any of the features on the map, to let us know what you think of the suggestions. This will be really useful when we come to detailed planning for each section. We will review all the comments as we develop our plans, although we won’t be able to reply to them all.”
If you would like to leave comments against any of the proposals you will need to request a user ID from firstname.lastname@example.org
Update below from ESCC:
In 2013, a partnership scheme between Brighton and Hove City Council (BHCC), East Sussex County Council (ESCC), the South Downs National Park Authority (SDNPA), with funding support from the Department for Transport, installed an unbound path along a permissive bridleway adjacent to Falmer Road between Woodingdean and Falmer. On the doorstep of the National Park, the 2.5km path has been a popular route for walkers, cyclists and commuters since it was installed as well as providing a key traffic-free link from Woodingdean to the University of Sussex campus and the American Express Community Stadium. Unfortunately, over time the path has eroded, become uneven and overgrown, making it unusable for some people.
In March 2021, a further partnership scheme between the three authorities will spend around £300,000 to enhance the existing route by installing a sealed, smooth surface and make it accessible for everyone using it. Funding is being provided by BHCC, SDNPA and ESCC (via the Department for Transport’s Emergency Active Travel Fund – tranche 2)
Key information about the improvement works are listed below:
If you require any further information regarding this partnership improvement scheme, then please do not hesitate to contact us at email@example.com
The public consultation for the Local Cycling & Walking Infrastructure Plan (LCWIP) is open from 30th October 2020 for a six-week period. This is East Sussex County Council’s (ESCC) proposed plan for the next 10 years.
Alongside the consultation, ESCC are also proposing to commission a feasibility study to identify the potential for providing fully segregated cycle routes and low traffic neighbourhoods. The scope of this study is currently being developed and they will share more information when it is available.
I have seen the original document and commented earlier this year. What may not be clear is that there is no allocated funding for any of the changes highlighted. If we want it to happen then it will need to be campaigned for.
Following on from the consultation, the Exceat Replacement Bridge Project feedback has been posted on ESCC website. Over 1000 responses were received!
You can read the full feedback here:
I’m quite disappointed to see that little attention has been paid to the comments / concerns we highlighted. There is also confirmation that the project doesn’t take into account the causeway, it is for the bridge only. As a small positive the road around the bridge will be slowed to 30mph from 60mph which will hopefully improve safety.
It does amuse me that the council feels that a controlled crossing will ‘spoil the natural landscape’… personally I can’t see the logic.
The planning application should be submitted in April next year. At this point we will have another opportunity to comment.
Have a read and let me know what you think!
If you’ve not heard yet The Highway Code is under review. The proposal is to amend The Highway Code to introduce a hierarchy of road users, clarify pedestrian and cyclist priority, establish safer overtaking.
Just imagine that… it would change our roads for cyclists and pedestrians. In my opinion this is way overdue. Over the past 30 years we have gone from 20 million to approaching 40 million cars. Our towns and cities haven’t got any bigger… just fuller. The whole road system is creaking.
Many people believe that roads are paid for by “Road Tax” but that isn’t true. Drivers pay Vehicle Excise Duty based on how polluting your car is. Roads are funded from general taxation. That means you have to pay for them whether you own a car or not. As such readdressing the balance in support of cyclists and pedestrians seems only fair.
Cycling UK have also highlighted rule 66 about riding 2 abreast:
However, one newly proposed rule – the new wording for Rule 66 – didn’t sit quite so easily with some people, particularly in respect of whether, and in what circumstances, cyclists can or should ride two abreast.
The current rule reads: “You should…never ride more than two abreast, and ride in single file on narrow or busy roads and when riding round bends”.
There are a number of issues with this wording – most notably that corners of country lanes and narrow roads are some of the most dangerous places for a driver to overtake a cyclist – but moving to single file at exactly this point may encourage them to do just that.
We were therefore initially happy with the proposed new wording, that:
“[cyclists’ should] ride in single file when drivers wish to overtake and it is safe to let them do so. When riding in larger groups on narrow lanes, it is sometimes safer to ride two abreast”.
Read the full article here:
I’ve already responded online and I urge you to do the same.
Consultation end on 11:59pm on 27 October 2020… so don’t delay.
People often comment on the Dutch and their obsession with the bicycle. Why do they cycle? The fact is they haven’t always.
“Before World War II, journeys in the Netherlands were predominantly made by bike, but in the 1950s and 1960s, as car ownership rocketed, this changed. As in many countries in Europe, roads became increasingly congested and cyclists were squeezed to the kerb.
The jump in car numbers caused a huge rise in the number of deaths on the roads. In 1971 more than 3,000 people were killed by motor vehicles, 450 of them children.
In response a social movement demanding safer cycling conditions for children was formed. Called Stop de Kindermoord (Stop the Child Murder), it took its name from the headline of an article written by journalist Vic Langenhoff whose own child had been killed in a road accident.”
There was lots of resistance to change – but look at it now! Infrastructure was the key. Would you be happy to let your child, grandchild, niece or nephew cycle alone? If the answer is yes – then it’s a good place to cycle.
Currently in the UK 60% of motor vehicle journeys are 1-2 miles. If we could replace many of those journeys with cycling just think how much easier it would be for commercial vehicles, emergency vehicles and those who need their car to get around.
My son is 12… we were recently looking at photos of me at the same age. One really obvious thing we noticed was how empty the streets were. Photos of me and friends on our bikes and skateboards. Playing Kerby. There were about 20 million cars – now there are 38.3 million. It’s happened slowly… slowly enough that no one noticed. Like my hairline – but in reverse.
Unfortunately during my time campaigning I have encountered a lack of conviction from East Sussex County Council who seem intent on keeping the status-quo. It is becoming increasingly obvious that climate change and biodiversity loss are changing the status-quo for us. A point made shockingly clear when watching David Attenborough: A Life on Our Planet yesterday.
It’s important to let your local politicians know what you think. They, after all, are there to represent our views.
All these initiatives are currently being supported by some local councillors / candidates.
Secondly we can lead by example. As a family we only use the car when we have to. If we can walk or cycle we do. That’s not just out of sheer bloody mindedness… I honestly prefer it. Driving is just so stressful and cycling turns a chore into fun with a bit of exercise thrown in. Trip to the post office via the seafront, bit of fresh air, leave the bike outside (no hassle with parking). Makes perfect sense.
Have a watch of the video below and see what you think. Would you be happier to cycle if it was like that? I know I certainly would.
Video courtesy of BicycleDutch on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC67YlPrRvsO117gFDM7UePg
In a meeting on Monday 17th August it was decided to not proceed with the plans that East Sussex County Council submitted to the Depart of Transport for funding in both Seaford and Newhaven.
Unfortunately after we provided three sets of proposed improvements none were included in any of the emergency measures. Therefore there will be no emergency measures to support walking and cycling in the Lewes District Council area from the first Tranche of funding.
You will find the meeting agenda here with officer recommendations:
You will find our initial suggestions here:
As you can imagine this is very disappointing to everyone involved and frankly quite surprising. The Secretary of State for Transport Grant Schapps and the Department for Transport were both asking for councils to do whatever they can to make it safer to walk and cycle.
I’m still hoping that we will get the additional cycle parking – although at this point I can’t get any information!
Cycle Seahaven member Councillor Carolyn Lambert commented:
“Some parts of Lewes, including Seaford, will receive no benefit from this funding. If the money is not spent, then the government will claw it back which would be a huge missed opportunity. Cycle Seahaven, one of the biggest cycling groups in the county, has put forward some perfectly achievable proposals, including some for simple signage, which seem to have been discounted. I hope that the County Council will re-consider its approach and listen to local residents”.
East Sussex County Council are currently developing a plan to replace the existing bridge at Exceat with a new two-lane two-way bridge. I will be putting together a considered response from Cycle Seahaven, so if you have any comments you can send them my way (firstname.lastname@example.org). Alternatively there is a survey at the link below if you wish to respond directly.
I know what I think already – but it would be good to hear a range of opinions from users of the current bridge.
“We write to advise you of the Public Engagement Exercise for the Exceat Bridge Replacement project. The Planning Authority (South Downs National Park) recommend that this event takes place now and the responses will be used to inform the ongoing design. The planning application will be submitted in early 2021 and we anticipate a decision from the South Downs National Park Authority in summer 2021.
The engagement starts on 13th July, and will run until 7th August; due to the current climate, it will be conducted online only. Posters are positioned around the Exceat Bridge and Seven Sisters Country Park Visitor’s Centre signposting people to details of the engagement, which can be found here: ”
Thanks to everyone who commented. Comments have been collated and sent to East Sussex Highways. Hopefully I’ve captured them all.
You will see that the general feeling is that cycling has been ignored in the designs and should taken into account before the full consultation next year.